Skip Navigation

InnovAiT 2008 1(7):494-495; doi:10.1093/innovait/inn067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the RCGP. All rights reserved. For permissions please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From the Trainer

Dr Judith Richardson

Assistant Director (GP), South East Scotland, UK

E-mail: Judith.Richardson@nes.scot.nhs.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


Figure 1

Working in a University Health Service, I find a significant proportion of my consultations are related to sexual health matters and in particular contraception. The majority of the students still favour the combined contraceptive pill or at least that is what I thought until I attended a recent family planning update as part of my Personal Development Plan (PDP).

The Health Care Research Partnership were commissioned to do a market research study with women in Scotland looking into . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?